“Everyone who wants to do good to the human race always ends in universal bullying.”
Good mental health is a sense of well-being, happiness, self esteem and confidence. It enables us to reach our potential, enjoy and appreciate other people through the formation of positive relationships that help us deal with life’s challenges. Poor mental health can lead to both internalized problems (e.g. anxiety, depression, suicidal tendencies, self criticism and eating disorders) and externalized problems. (e.g. bullying, violence and substance abuse)
One in five Australians, one in four North Americans and British adults will suffer from a mental illness at some point in their lives, according to the government reports. World Health Organization (2001) estimates that approximately 450 million people worldwide have a mental health problem.
In one cross-sectional study into bullying in NSW schools, it was found that 23.5% of students experienced some form of bullying, and that those who are bullied/bullies are at an increased risk of depression and suicide.
Definition of Bullying
Bullying often involves a more powerful person or group (bully) oppressing a less powerful person or group (victim), often on the grounds of a ‘perceived’ difference. This difference can be related to ethnic background or culture, gender, sexuality or sexual orientation, ability or disability, political or religious orientation, physical appearance, age, marital status, parenting status or economic status.
Here is a list of bullying characteristics:
- may be physical (hitting or punching)
- may be verbal (name-calling, teasing)
- may be psychological (threats, manipulating, fear mongering),
- may be social (social exclusion, rumors, put downs)
- may be sexual (physical, verbal or nonverbal sexual conduct)
- may be cyber-bullying (mobiles/email/internet)
Special Note on Cyber-bullying
Cyber-bullying can occur 24 hour per day, seven days a week via technology such as the internet and mobiles phones. Cyber-bullying is just as real as physical bullying and can have devastating consequences. Educators, parents and the community in general can not just rely on the physical evidence of bullying. According to (http://isafe.org) the statistics for cyber-bullying are:
- 42% of kids have been cyber-bullied. 1 in 4 had it happen more than once.
- 35% of kids have been threatened online. Nearly 1 in 5 had it happen more than once.
- 21% of kids have received mean or threatening e-mail or other messages.
- 58% of kids admit someone has said mean or hurtful things to them online. More than 4 out of 10 say it has happened more than once.
- 53% of kids admit having said something mean or hurtful to another person online. More than 1 in 3 have done it more than once.
- 58% have not told their parents or an adult about being cyber-bullied.
One Contributing Factor
Various studies show that the family childhood environment provides the basic social ecology where behavior is learned and suppressed.
Patricia Evans in her book Controlling People: How to Recognize, Understand, and Deal with People Who Try to Control You, looks at the underlying factors of intimate abuse between the controller and the victim in abusive relationships. Concepts of ‘backward’ personality and relationship are introduced and explained how these are the consequences of constant parental defining, invalidating and oppression.
Most people use emotions, reasoning, physical sensations and intuition as the four internal functions for internal guidance. A ‘backward’ personality or a ‘controller’ who has suffered some emotional or physical trauma during childhood/adolescence/adulthood and has underdeveloped parts of the brain related to empathy, does not use these four functions in unison. Instead, as a defense mechanism, reasoning is used only.
Once controllers gain trust of another person, they start to project their idea of a ‘perfect’ person onto the other person. They tend to see others the same way children see teddy bears, a perfect friend who knows exactly what the controller is thinking, never talks backs or disagrees. They don’t see the person for what they are, a ‘separate’ person with a personality and needs of their own.
The problem actually lies in the fact that controllers tend to construct their sense of self from the outside-in and not the inside-out. This causes them not to have a sense of themselves and actually be ‘beside’ themselves. Their personalities are constructs created to win the love and admiration they seek. They have anchored themselves inside another person and this anchor tends to make them feel secure. Without this anchor, they feel completely lost producing a massive fear and anxiety of ‘separateness’ inside of them. Because of this fear and anxiety, their need to control is like an addiction and extremely strong.
The controller’s reaction towards someone who disagrees, thinks ‘differently’, or simply doesn’t fulfill their illusion of the teddy bear can be cold, tactless, extreme and lack empathy. Especially towards the ones closest to them such as their partners or children. They simply lack emotional maturity or emotional intelligence.
Conversations with them seem to be of imperative nature and they can get verbally abusive and become bullies. Most people notice when they are in the presence of a controller since they are defined by the controller as if he or she knew what the other person is/was thinking. The controllers have also been referred to as control freaks in various literature.
The tragedy for the controller is that their behavior creates a paradox. It pushes away the love and connection that they so desperately need.
The reality for victims of controllers is that they experience verbal abuse, oppression and bullying. Eventually, the victims blame themselves and think that if they change to please the controller things would get better. This rarely happens.
This type of defining, oppression and control has a significant impact on the victim, bully, and witness’ self esteem and mental health. Especially during parenting periods as it creates children who can become abusive later in lives. According to some studies, they may become toxic parents to their own kids, toxic bosses to their subordinates, bullies to others or even criminals. Remember as children see, children do.
With future predictions of dramatic increases of problems in mental health, widespread bullying and the lack of awareness of positive parenting, there is a need for the implementation of educational and awareness programs with an inter-agency effort.
As shown in Duncan et al. (2009), suggested methods of prevention are by introducing mindful parenting which focuses on positive parenting and creating a positive parent-child relationship.
Any future programs should focus on increasing community’s awareness with clear definitions on positive parental discipline and inclusion of management system for early detection of abuse within home and school settings.
“Ignorance does not justify oppression, it only makes it possible”
This is an extract from Influence of Parenting Styles.
Copyright Robert Mijas 2011.
Anderson, C.A., & Carnegey, L.A. (2004).Violent Evil and General Aggression Model: The Social Psychology Of Good and Evil (pp. 168-192). New York: Guilford Publications.
Bennett, D.S., Wolan Sullivan, M., & Wood, R. (2006). Relations of Parental Report and Observation of Parenting to Maltreatment History. Child Maltreatment. 2006 February ; 11(1): 63–75.
Chang, L., Schwartz, D., Dodge, K.A., & McBride-Chang, C. (2003). Harsh Parenting in Relation to Child Emotion Regulation and Aggression. Journal of Family Psychology. 2003 December ; 17(4): 598–606.
Chesson, R. (1999). Bullying: the need for an interagency response. BMJ, 319:330–1
Duncan, L.G., Coatsworth, D., & Greenberg, M.T. (2009). A Model of Mindful Parenting: Implications for Parent–Child Relationships and Prevention Research. Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review. (2009) 12:255–270
Evans, P. (2002). Controlling People: How to Recognize, Understand, and Deal with People Who Try to Control You. Avon, MA: Adams Media.
Forero, R., McLyndall, L., Rissel, C., & Bauman, A. (1999). Bullying behaviour and psychosocial health among school students in New South Wales, Australia: cross sectional survey. BMJ (1999);319:344–8.
Forward, S. (1989). Toxic Parents: Overcoming Their Hurtful Legacy and Reclaiming Your Life. New York, NY: Bantam Book
Government of Western Australia (n.d.). Creating a mentally healthy community. Retrieved September, 15, 2010, from: http://www.mentalhealth.wa.gov.au/Homepage.aspx
Hoeve, M., Dubas J.S., Eichelsheim, V.I., Van der Laan, P.H., Smeenk, W., & Gerris, J.R. (2009). The Relationship between Parenting and Delinquency: A Meta-analysis. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology 37:749–775.
Kerr, D., Capaldi, D.M., Pears, K.C., & Owen, L.D. (2009). A Prospective Three Generational Study of Fathers’ Constructive Parenting: Influences from Family of Origin, Adolescent Adjustment, and Offspring Temperament. Development Psychol. 2009 September; 45(5): 1257–1275.
Mental Health Foundation (n.d.). Statistics on mental health. Retrieved September, 15, 2010, from: http://www.mentalhealth.org.uk/information/mental-health-overview/statistics/
National Institute of Mental Health (n.d.). The Numbers Count: Mental Disorders in America. Retrieved September, 15, 2010, from: http://www.nimh.nih.gov/health/publications/the-numbers-count-mental-disorders-in-america/index.shtml
Pepler, D. (2005). Bullying Interventions: A Binocular Perspective. Journal of CDN. ACAD. Child and Adolescence Psychiatry 15:1 February 2006.
Sawatzky, R., Ratner, P.A., Johnson, J.L., Kopec, J.A., & Zumbo, B.D. (2010). Self-reported physical and mental health status and quality of life in adolescents: a latent variable mediation model. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 2010, 8:17.
Williams, K.R., Guerra, N.G., Kim, T.E., & Sadek, S. (2010). Predictors of Bullying and Victimization in Childhood and Adolescence: A Meta-analytic Investigation School Psychology Quarterly 2010, Vol. 25, No. 2, 65–83.